31.05.2015 Views

GB Meter Franking - The Meter Stamp Society

GB Meter Franking - The Meter Stamp Society

GB Meter Franking - The Meter Stamp Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BRITISH STAMPS<br />

<strong>GB</strong> <strong>Meter</strong> <strong>Franking</strong><br />

Part 6—Postwar to Decimalisation<br />

Continuing his history of meter franking, Jack Peach looks back at the<br />

postwar period, with new machines, new frank designs, and company<br />

amalgamations<br />

Peacetime and shortages<br />

<strong>The</strong> last article brought our story to the end of the 1939-45 war. <strong>The</strong> factories of the<br />

meter machine manufacturers had been primarily engaged in making armaments rather<br />

than cancelling and franking machines. Since 1936 the UPF factory had been in Cannon<br />

Street, Islington, but by 1946 the lease was due to expire. New premises were found at<br />

Edmonton but the ‘fuel crisis’ during the winter of 1946-47 and general shortages of<br />

materials did not help the transfer. <strong>The</strong> company gained priority support from the Post<br />

Office and the Board of Trade so that by the end of 1947 the move had been completed.<br />

UPF had used the telegraphic code In 1931 Roneo-Neopost had been registered<br />

and the production of the Neopost<br />

word ‘Francopost’ for some years so, with a<br />

slight change of spelling, the Edmonton machine transferred to the Roneo factory<br />

factory became the Frankopost Works. <strong>The</strong> in Romford, where the modern machines<br />

name Universal Postal Frankers was a bit of are still made today.<br />

a mouthful for everyday use so the word During the war Roneo, like others, were<br />

‘Frankopost’ was used in connection with concerned with armament production.<br />

all UPF products. It also made a better When the war ended they were faced with<br />

comparison with ‘Neopost’!<br />

similar problems in getting back to franking<br />

machine manufacture as were UPF. At<br />

During this immediate postwar period<br />

Frank Parfett (in charge of UPF machine Romford, however, priority was given to<br />

development) spent time restyling the making Roneo duplicators; franking machines<br />

had to take a back seat. Little or no<br />

Midget which had remained virtually unchanged<br />

since its introduction 20 years development took place. <strong>The</strong> Neopost<br />

previously. Frank Parfett, incidentally, had<br />

been concerned with franking machine<br />

design since he joined Frank Langdon at<br />

UPF to develop their first NZ model in<br />

1922. Langdon had left UPF in 1934 to<br />

form his own company, Langdon Precision<br />

Engineers Ltd, to develop and manufacture<br />

industrial machine tools in his factory<br />

in Battersea. It will be recalled that Langdon<br />

had been responsible for the development<br />

of the first Neopost machine with<br />

Kinnard in 1927.<br />

Fig 105 (below) Frankopost Simplex<br />

Fig 106 (bottom right) Mark made by the<br />

Frankopost Simplex<br />

Fig 107 (right) Cover franked by the<br />

Frankopost Multivalue machine of the<br />

Post Office Foreign Section<br />

range had remained unchanged since the<br />

introduction of the Limited Value machine<br />

in 1930. It was clear that a multivalue machine<br />

was much needed. As a matter of<br />

fact, Roneo had designed a prototype before<br />

the war but it proved too costly to<br />

produce and was generally unacceptable.<br />

Roneo-Neopost approached Frank Langdon<br />

and he agreed to undertake a design.<br />

As the production of franking machines<br />

increased it became necessary to extend<br />

the prefixes of more popular machines.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ‘UA’ for the UPF Multivalue was followed<br />

by ‘UB’, ‘UC’ to ‘UF’ in George VI’s<br />

reign and to ‘UK’ in later years. <strong>The</strong> Pitney<br />

Bowes Model CV followed the prefix ‘P’<br />

with ‘PA’ and ‘PC’ later (‘PB’ was already<br />

being used on Single Value machines).<br />

<strong>The</strong> restyling of the Midget machine was<br />

completed and launched as the Frankopost<br />

Simplex with the prefix letter ‘S’ and<br />

later by ‘SA’.<br />

22 G.S.M. October 2001


BRITISH STAMPS<br />

Fig 108 Ticket Issue Machines Ltd<br />

Cambridge trial mark<br />

Fig 109 Westinghouse-Garrard Ticket<br />

Machines Ltd used by British Rail<br />

Fig 110 Frankopost Simplex trial on tape<br />

from a roll<br />

Fig 111 An example from the Parcel-<br />

Label Printing and Issuing Machine No 2<br />

Fig 112 Frank from the Festival of Britain<br />

Branch Office TIM machine<br />

Fig 113 Specimen examples from the<br />

British Industries TIM machine. <strong>The</strong><br />

machine printed its mark in two<br />

operations and the lower example has<br />

part missing<br />

Fig 105 illustrates the machine and Fig<br />

106 the mark made. <strong>The</strong> Simplex machine<br />

was of the Limited Value type with a range<br />

of 13 values from 1 ⁄2d. to 6 1 ⁄2d. This was the<br />

only new machine introduced during the<br />

reign of King George VI.<br />

In the last article some uses of franking<br />

machines by the Post Office were described.<br />

Another use was by the Foreign Section,<br />

mainly on Post Office mail to countries<br />

abroad. As far as is known, only one machine<br />

was used, a Frankopost Multivalue<br />

machine number UB 52. <strong>The</strong> town mark<br />

was London/FS. An example with the<br />

added handstamp ‘On Postal Service’ is<br />

shown in Fig 107 on a cover from GPO HQ<br />

to Belgium.<br />

Parcel post<br />

Parcels sent through the post attracted a<br />

large number of rates and in most cases<br />

more than one adhesive stamp had to be<br />

applied. This meant much ‘licking and<br />

sticking’! By 1947 several machines had<br />

been developed which could print money<br />

values on to paper tape held in roll form<br />

and from which short lengths could be<br />

readily separated after receiving a printed<br />

value. <strong>The</strong>se machines had been largely<br />

developed to provide receipts for fares on<br />

buses and trams. <strong>The</strong> Post Office saw their<br />

potential for use at post office counters to<br />

produce postage paid labels, gummed on<br />

one side, for fixing on parcels.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first trials took place at Romford and<br />

Cambridge between April and September<br />

1947. <strong>The</strong> two Limited Value machines<br />

were made by Ticket Issue Machines Ltd<br />

(TIM). <strong>The</strong> 12 values ranged from 6d. to<br />

1s.5d. in steps of 1d. Fig 108 illustrates the<br />

mark made by the Cambridge trial machine.<br />

<strong>The</strong> example is clearly dated 20 AP<br />

47, although the official date for it being<br />

brought into use was 28 April 1947.<br />

<strong>The</strong> trials were considered successful<br />

and the Post Office ordered 100 machines<br />

which they called ‘Parcel Label Machine<br />

No 1’. <strong>The</strong> main difference in the mark<br />

made by the production machines was the<br />

wording ‘PARCEL POST/PAID’ instead of<br />

‘PARCEL POST’. <strong>The</strong>y came into use in<br />

1948.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second type of machine to be tested<br />

was made by Westinghouse-Garrard Ticket<br />

Machines Ltd. Again, the test was undertaken<br />

at Cambridge between 12 December<br />

1947 and 2 November 1948. A further<br />

trial was carried out at Birmingham between<br />

14 February 1949 and September<br />

1950. No orders were placed but similar<br />

machines were later used by British Rail<br />

(Fig 109).<br />

In September 1950 two Frankopost<br />

Simplex machines were modified to print<br />

on tape from a roll. <strong>The</strong>se were placed for<br />

trial at Romford and Birmingham, respectively.<br />

An example from Birmingham is<br />

illustrated (Fig110). Again, no orders were<br />

placed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> last of the series of trials was undertaken<br />

on two machines made by Setright<br />

Registers Ltd in October 1951, installed at<br />

Birmingham and Cambridge. <strong>The</strong>y were<br />

Limited Value-type machines and no orders<br />

were placed at that time.<br />

Arising from the experience gained in<br />

these various tests, a specification was prepared<br />

for a two-bank Multivalue-type machine.<br />

In the event, an order for 600 machines<br />

was placed with Setright Registers.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y were capable of printing any value<br />

between 1d. and 19s.11d. (in steps of 1d.).<br />

Known as the Parcel-Label Printing and<br />

Issuing Machine No 2, they came into use<br />

in 1959. An example is shown (Fig 111).<br />

One of these machines is in the Heritage<br />

Collections at the Post Office, arranged to<br />

print Specimen examples.<br />

A TIM machine was installed at the<br />

Festival of Britain Branch Office in 1951.<br />

Only 2000 labels were printed (only 73<br />

went on to actual parcels!) so they are not<br />

very common (Fig 112).<br />

<strong>The</strong> TIM machine printed its mark in<br />

two operations as shown by the Specimen<br />

examples from a machine at the British<br />

Industries Fair (Fig 113—on one the lefthand<br />

part of the mark has been omitted).<br />

By 1960 only Setright machines were in<br />

use.<br />

New reign, new frank<br />

King George VI died on 6 February 1952<br />

and was succeeded by his elder daughter,<br />

Elizabeth—Queen Elizabeth II. <strong>The</strong> general<br />

style of franks remained the same but<br />

the cypher was changed to EIIR, there was<br />

also a change to the shape of the crown.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se franks are known by collectors as<br />

group E.<br />

Pitney Bowes Single Value and Model<br />

CV meters, UPF NZ, Midget and Simplex<br />

machines and Neopost Fixed Value and<br />

Limited Value machines all changed to the<br />

new style of frank in 1953. Only three NZ<br />

machines (numbered NZ 13, NZ 16 and<br />

NZ 170) were still in use and no Pitney<br />

Bowes Model H machines changed.<br />

In 1953 UPF (Frankopost) introduced<br />

a Simplex machine capable of printing<br />

25 different values. This was called the<br />

‘Major’ model and values ranged from 1 ⁄2d.<br />

to 1s. 1 ⁄2d. <strong>The</strong> original 13-value machine<br />

( 1 ⁄2d. to 6 1 ⁄2d.) was called the ‘Junior’ model.<br />

SA and SB prefixes were used with Junior<br />

machines. <strong>The</strong> Simplex Major was more<br />

popular and prefixes ran from SX to SZ,<br />

then backwards SW to SV; SV being<br />

reserved for Junior models converted to<br />

Major. One machine, SZ 638, used by<br />

G.S.M. October 2001 23


BRITISH STAMPS<br />

Fig 114 (top) Label from the modified Simplex Major machine of Draffens of<br />

Dundee<br />

Fig 115 (above) Specimen label from Draffens’ second machine, numbered<br />

SL2, on tape intended for the multivalue machine<br />

Fig 116 (below) A label anticipating foreign sales of the Simplex<br />

MacRobertson & Hutchinson of Glasgow,<br />

was issued posthumously with a George VI<br />

Group D frank die.<br />

Although the normal Simplex machines<br />

could not print on to continuous paper<br />

tape, it has been mentioned that two<br />

machines were modified for the Post Office<br />

to produce parcel post labels. In 1955 a<br />

similarly modified Major model was sold<br />

to Draffens of Dundee Ltd. <strong>The</strong> values<br />

printed ranged from 1d. to 2s.1d. in steps<br />

of 1d. <strong>The</strong> prefix SL was allocated to this<br />

model.<br />

Fig 114 shows labels for this machine,<br />

numbered SL1. Initially, ‘SL1 DUNDEE<br />

ANGUS’ was printed continuously along<br />

the tape. Later, when the company acquired<br />

a second machine, the wording was<br />

changed to ‘DRAFFENS OF DUNDEE<br />

LTD. ANGUS’. <strong>The</strong> second machine,<br />

numbered SL2, was supplied in 1956. This<br />

was a Junior model with values from 1 ⁄2d. to<br />

1s. 1 ⁄2d. Some specimens from this machine<br />

were printed on tape intended for the<br />

multivalue machine UF 490 (Fig 115), later<br />

the normal DRAFFEN tape was used. Only<br />

two machines were sold in the UK but<br />

foreign sales were at least anticipated, as<br />

illustrated in Fig 116 for use in Singapore.<br />

By 1955 Langdon had developed a multivalue<br />

machine for Neopost. It was given<br />

the name ‘Frankmaster’ and the earliest<br />

model was available for commercial use<br />

in that year. <strong>The</strong> electrically-driven<br />

version is illustrated (Fig 117). As<br />

introduced, the machine was heavy<br />

and awkward to handle, bearing in<br />

mind that it had to be taken to a local<br />

post office for resetting. <strong>The</strong> features<br />

offered were the basic minimum.<br />

Nevertheless, it filled a major gap in<br />

the Neopost range. Development<br />

continued and a redesigned version<br />

called the Model 305 was launched<br />

in 1965. During the ‘E’ frank period,<br />

prefixes used were NA to ND. For each<br />

prefix, machine numbers ranged from 001<br />

to 999. <strong>The</strong>re were several versions of the<br />

Neopost 305 with either 3 or 4 operable<br />

banks. From the right of the frank, the first<br />

bank printed either ‘ 1 ⁄2’ or ‘=’, the second<br />

bank printed ‘=’ for the nil value, then ‘1’<br />

to ‘11’ (‘10’ and ‘11’ were printed as if<br />

single characters). <strong>The</strong> third bank used ‘0’<br />

for the nil value, then printed ‘1’ to ‘9’.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fourth bank again used ‘=’ as the nil<br />

value, then printed ‘1’ to ‘9’. Fig 118 shows<br />

how ‘2d.’ appeared. Fig 119 is a specimen,<br />

illustrating the maximum possible value<br />

from a four-bank machine and shows ‘11’<br />

as a single character. Fig 120 shows a frank<br />

on a piece of continuous tape.<br />

As with the Simplex, one machine,<br />

numbered NA 156, used by James H<br />

Lamont of Edinburgh, was fitted with a G<br />

VI R Group D die posthumously. It would<br />

appear that the machine was originally<br />

supplied with an EIIR die. It has been<br />

suggested that the user requested a G VI R<br />

die for patriotic reasons!<br />

At Universal Postal Frankers their design<br />

team had been commissioned to redesign<br />

the multivalue machine. <strong>The</strong> new version<br />

was launched in 1958 with the name<br />

‘Automax’.<br />

Three-bank machines had the value<br />

range 1 ⁄2d. to 9s.11 1 ⁄2d. and four-bank either<br />

1<br />

⁄2d. to 29s.11 1 ⁄2d. or 1 ⁄2d. to 99s.11 1 ⁄2d.<br />

Hand-driven models could print up to<br />

40 items/minute and electrically-driven<br />

models up to 80 items/minute. <strong>The</strong> earliest<br />

recorded date for commercial use was 12<br />

November 1958, although Specimens with<br />

earlier dates are known (Fig 121).<br />

<strong>The</strong> prefixes used with Group E franks<br />

were A and AA, each prefix catered for<br />

numbers from 001 to 999. Fig 122 illustrates<br />

each of the prefixes. Some early<br />

machines had a small ‘=’ sign as the nil<br />

value in the first bank, also shown.<br />

Fig 118 A frank from the Neopost 305<br />

Fig 117 <strong>The</strong><br />

electricallydriven<br />

version<br />

of the<br />

Neopost<br />

Frankmaster<br />

24 G.S.M. October 2001


BRITISH STAMPS<br />

Fig 119 A specimen from<br />

the Neopost 305 showing<br />

the maximum possible<br />

value<br />

Fig 120 A frank from the<br />

Neopost 305 on a continuous<br />

piece of tape<br />

Fig 121 A specimen frank from the Universal Postal Frankers Automax machine<br />

Fig 122 <strong>The</strong> two prefixes, A and AA, used with the Automax machine<br />

G.S.M. October 2001 25


BRITISH STAMPS<br />

Fig 123 Group F frank from a Frankopost<br />

Multivalue machine Fig 124<br />

Emblems<br />

Following the change of adhesive stamp<br />

design coinciding with the new reign, the<br />

postal authorities noted comment in the<br />

press and elsewhere that it was time to<br />

consider changing the design of meter<br />

franks. A major criticism was that they<br />

resembled an adhesive stamp. It should be<br />

remembered that 30 years previously,<br />

when the design was introduced, the main<br />

reason for change was that the original<br />

design was insufficiently like that of an<br />

adhesive stamp! <strong>The</strong> Post Office asked the<br />

two manufacturers (UPF and Neopost) to<br />

propose a new design. <strong>The</strong>y, in turn,<br />

consulted the Council of Industrial Design,<br />

who nominated Stuart Rose, a well-known<br />

industrial artist.<br />

Stuart Rose prepared a design which was<br />

submitted to <strong>The</strong> Queen and approved by<br />

her.<br />

<strong>The</strong> new design embraced the floral<br />

emblems of the constituent parts of the<br />

United Kingdom; a rose for England, a<br />

thistle for Scotland, a daffodil for Wales<br />

and a shamrock for Northern Ireland.<br />

This design of frank—Group F—came<br />

into use in September 1959. Fig 123 shows<br />

the new frank fitted to a Frankopost Multivalue<br />

machine in use at Pitney Bowes’<br />

Birmingham office.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following machine models were in<br />

use when Group F franks were introduced<br />

and were fitted with the new franks. Group<br />

F franks were in use up to decimalisation<br />

and the prefixes used by these machines<br />

until that time were:<br />

Neopost LV N<br />

Pitney Bowes CV P, PA, PC<br />

Simplex Junior S, SA, SB<br />

Simplex Junior SV<br />

Mmachines<br />

Mconverted to<br />

MSimplex Major SV<br />

Simplex Major SX to SZ then<br />

backwards<br />

SW to SG<br />

omitting SI, SO,<br />

and SQ<br />

UPF Multivalue U, UA to UK<br />

omitting UI<br />

Neopost NA to NX<br />

MFrankmaster omitting NI<br />

Pitney Bowes A, AA to AH<br />

MAutomax<br />

Machines not fitted with Group F dies<br />

were: Pitney Bowes Model H; UPF Midget;<br />

Universal NZ and Pitney Bowes A, B and F.<br />

Specimens from<br />

Model CV<br />

machines before<br />

and after the<br />

merger of UPF<br />

with Pitney<br />

Bowes<br />

Fig 127 Frank from a four-bank Pitney<br />

Bowes 5000 Series machine<br />

Fig 126 <strong>The</strong> Neopost Model 205<br />

machine<br />

Fig 128 Hand-driven<br />

(above) and<br />

electrically-driven<br />

(right) 5000 Series<br />

machines<br />

Fig 125 (below)<br />

Specimen mark<br />

on perforated<br />

adhesive tape<br />

from the<br />

Neopost<br />

Model 205<br />

26 G.S.M. October 2001


BRITISH STAMPS<br />

Pitney Bowes and UPF<br />

become one<br />

It will be recalled that since 1929 UPF had<br />

been the agents for Pitney Bowes. By the<br />

late 1950s the embarrassing situation had<br />

arisen whereby Pitney Bowes and UPF<br />

were competing against each other in<br />

world markets. An International Division<br />

was created in Pitney Bowes and in 1959,<br />

by shareholding arrangements, UPF became<br />

a wholly owned subsidiary of Pitney<br />

Bowes. In January 1960 a new company,<br />

Pitney Bowes Ltd, was registered in the UK.<br />

In September a letter was sent to all customers<br />

and dealers stating that from 1<br />

October 1960 the name Universal Postal<br />

Frankers was being changed to Pitney Bowes<br />

Ltd. <strong>The</strong> two specimens from Model CV<br />

machines (Fig 124) illustrate the change.<br />

<strong>The</strong> resources available to the new company<br />

meant that Roneo-Neopost was faced<br />

with a very formidable competitor. New<br />

products, not only franking machines but<br />

other associated postroom equipment which<br />

had been developed by Pitney Bowes in<br />

USA, were now more readily available in<br />

the UK market. Roneo-Neopost decided<br />

that the only speedy solution was to associate<br />

with foreign manufacturers of equipment<br />

which would enhance their product<br />

range. <strong>The</strong> first of these was with the<br />

French franking machine maker Societe<br />

pour l’Affranchissement et le Timbrage<br />

Automatique (SATAS) to make their small<br />

multivalue machine in Romford. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

appeared in the UK as Neopost Model 205<br />

in April 1963. <strong>The</strong> machine was small in<br />

size and electrically driven. It was a threebank<br />

machine with a value range 1 ⁄2d. to<br />

9s.11 1 ⁄2d. (actually, there was a smaller<br />

range model, 1 ⁄2d. to 4s.11 1 ⁄2d., but the<br />

marks are indistinguishable). <strong>The</strong> size of<br />

the frank was the smallest in Group F. A<br />

specimen mark made on perforated adhesive<br />

tape is shown in Fig 125 and the<br />

machine in Fig 126.<br />

<strong>The</strong> prefix in the specimen example is<br />

‘RN’ (presumably Roneo-Neopost) often<br />

used at this period for such specimens.<br />

<strong>The</strong> normal prefix in commercial franks<br />

was ‘J’, followed by a number of up to four<br />

figures.<br />

In 1959 it had been decided that Pitney<br />

Bowes’ British factory should be a main<br />

source of meter machines for the world<br />

market. Between 1961 and 1963 a new<br />

factory was built and equipped at Harlow,<br />

Essex. <strong>The</strong> first major project was the 5000<br />

Series of multivalue machines developed<br />

in the USA. By November 1963 the factory<br />

was ready for the official opening. <strong>The</strong><br />

Assistant Postmaster General passed the<br />

first letter through a 5300 Postage <strong>Meter</strong><br />

Machine. At that time the Post Office had<br />

not given its approval for commercial use.<br />

It was launched on 9 March 1964.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were two models, the three-bank<br />

5335 with a value range 0/0 1 ⁄2d. to 10s.11 1 ⁄2d.<br />

(‘10’ and ‘11’ in bank 2 and the ‘10’ in<br />

bank 3 were engraved as single characters.<br />

<strong>The</strong> nil value in bank 1 (halfpenny) was<br />

‘=’. <strong>The</strong> four-bank model, 5345, had a<br />

range ∼0/0 1 ⁄2d. to 99s.11 1 ⁄2d. <strong>The</strong> symbol ‘∼’<br />

was printed by the fourth bank unless a<br />

button was depressed when it could print<br />

‘1’ to ‘9’. This was a safeguard against very<br />

high value franks being printed accidentally.<br />

Both hand-driven (Model 5400) and<br />

electrically-driven (Model 5500) bases were<br />

available. <strong>The</strong> meters were detachable<br />

from the bases for resetting at a post office.<br />

<strong>The</strong> machine numbers in the franks<br />

comprised a prefix ‘P.B.’ followed by a<br />

three-figure number and a suffix ‘A’ to ‘L’<br />

(some letters were omitted, perhaps used<br />

on machines for abroad). Fig 127 shows the<br />

mark made by a four-bank model used at<br />

Pitney Bowes Harlow factory. Fig 128<br />

illustrates the machine fitted to hand- and<br />

electrically-driven bases. <strong>The</strong> 5000 Series<br />

of machines was a replacement for the<br />

Automax.<br />

Roneo-Neopost looks abroad<br />

Over the years the Neopost Limited Value<br />

machine had been very successful and it<br />

was obviously considered worthwhile to<br />

put some effort into a redesign. In 1964<br />

the improved version was introduced as<br />

the Neopost 105. This time there were ten<br />

values: 2 1 ⁄2d., 3d., 3 1 ⁄2d., 4d., 4 1 ⁄2d., 5d., 6d.,<br />

Fig 130 Two marks from<br />

American-made Model RT<br />

machines modified to suit<br />

British currency<br />

7 1 ⁄2d., 9d. and 1s. <strong>The</strong> machine was smaller<br />

(footprint 9in×9in) than the previous<br />

model and was said to be the cheapest<br />

machine in the UK. Repeating franks was<br />

rapid and with a label dispenser could deal<br />

with parcels. <strong>The</strong> machine number in the<br />

frank had the pattern, prefix N, threefigure<br />

number, suffix ‘A’ to ‘L’ (omitting ‘I’).<br />

<strong>The</strong> mark made is shown in Fig 129.<br />

<strong>The</strong> changes in policy at Roneo-Neopost<br />

towards meter franking and postroom<br />

equipment from 1960 onwards meant<br />

more development activity at the Romford<br />

factory. Langdon, who had undertaken<br />

earlier development and who was still<br />

making the Model 305 in his factory, was<br />

aware of this and his future seemed uncertain.<br />

In 1964 Roneo made an offer for<br />

his business which he accepted and Langdon<br />

Precision Engineers became a subsidiary<br />

of Roneo-Neopost.<br />

Towards the end of 1965 Pitney Bowes<br />

Ltd modified some of the American-made<br />

Model RT machines to suit British currency.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se multivalue machines were<br />

used on collating, sealing and franking<br />

machines similar to the Model AV which<br />

used the CV meter. <strong>The</strong> meter was similar<br />

to but smaller than the 5000 Series and<br />

had only two banks.<br />

<strong>The</strong> values ranged from 0/0 1 ⁄2d. to 9 1 ⁄2d.;<br />

being decimal, 9 1 ⁄2d. was the highest value.<br />

Fig 130 shows two examples of the mark.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ‘0/’ and ‘D’ were fixtures and part of<br />

the main frank die. <strong>The</strong> town mark (of<br />

varying style) was very close to the frank.<br />

<strong>The</strong> machine number had the Prefix ‘RT’<br />

followed by a four-figure number. <strong>The</strong> ‘nil’<br />

value symbol in the first bank was either ‘-’<br />

or ‘=’. <strong>The</strong> date had an apostrophe before<br />

the year.<br />

Fig 129 Frank from the redesigned Neopost Limited Value machine—<br />

the Neopost 105<br />

G.S.M. October 2001 27


BRITISH STAMPS<br />

Fig 132 <strong>The</strong> Model 605<br />

and its detachable<br />

meter<br />

Fig 131 Franks from<br />

Postalia Freistempler<br />

Gmbh’s Model P3, sold<br />

as the Roneo-Neopost<br />

Model 605, showing<br />

solidus and apostrophe<br />

Fig 133 Examples of franks from the<br />

Hasler Frankiermaschinen company’s<br />

Model F88. <strong>The</strong> frank design, similar<br />

to a Dutch frank (centre), was used<br />

only by this machine which could<br />

also accommodate a larger than<br />

normal slogan (bottom)<br />

Following the deal with SATAS, Roneo-<br />

Neopost made an arrangement with the<br />

German company, Postalia Freistempler<br />

Gmbh, for their Model P3 to be sold as the<br />

Roneo-Neopost Model 605. It was an<br />

advanced machine capable of automatically<br />

feeding, sealing, franking, stacking<br />

and counting up to 10,000 items per hour.<br />

Another feature was that the meter could<br />

be detached from the base and used by<br />

itself; ‘wiping’ it across the item to be<br />

franked. For countries with decimal currencies<br />

the machine was offered in threebank<br />

and four-bank models but in UK only<br />

one bank could be used, printing values ‘1’<br />

to ‘9’ (no ‘ 1 ⁄2’). Characters to the left of the<br />

shilling solidus were either ‘∼0’ or ‘∼∼’. In<br />

some machines the solidus was replaced by<br />

an apostrophe (Fig 131). <strong>The</strong> Model 605<br />

entered the UK market early in 1967 and<br />

the machine number comprised prefix<br />

‘TN’ followed by a three-figure number.<br />

<strong>The</strong> complete machine and the detachable<br />

meter (arrowed) are illustrated (Fig 132).<br />

28 G.S.M. October 2001

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!